Spectral response modeling and analysis of p–n–p In0.53Ga0.47As/InP HPTs
Chen Jun†, , Lv Jiabing
School of Electronic and Information Engineering, Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, China

 

† Corresponding author. E-mail: junchen@suda.edu.cn

Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61307044), the National Basic Research Program of China (Grant No. 2012CB619200), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, China (Grant No. BK20130321), the Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China (Grant No. 20133201120009), the Open Project of Key Laboratory of Infrared Imaging Materials and Detectors, Chinese Academy of Sciences (IIMDKFJJ-15-06), the Scientific Research Foundation for the Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars, Ministry of Education of China, and the Research Innovation Program for College Graduates of Jiangsu Province, China (Grant No. SJLX15-0600).

Abstract
Abstract

We report our results on the modeling of the spectral response of the near-infrared (NIR) lattice-matched p–n–p In0.53Ga0.47As/InP heterojunction phototransistors (HPTs). The spectral response model is developed from the solution of the steady state continuity equations that dominate the excess optically generated minority-carriers in the active regions of the HPTs with accurate boundary conditions. In addition, a detailed optical-power absorption profile is constructed for the device modeling. The calculated responsivity is in good agreement with the measured one for the incident radiation at 980 nm, 1310 nm, and 1550 nm. Furthermore, the variation in the responsivity of the device with the base region width is analyzed.

1. Introduction

Development of photodetectors with high sensitivity, high speed, and low power consumption has been a main goal in device research for optical communication applications. Metal–semiconductor–metal (MSM) and p–i–n photodetectors can provide high speed, low noise operation but no internal gain.[14] Avalanche photodiodes (APDs) can achieve high sensitivity due to the large internal gain, however, they need high operation voltages.[5] It is therefore expected that heterojunction phototransistors (HPTs) can provide an exciting alternative to p–i–n photodetectors or APDs for the optical communication application. An HPT basically is a heterojunction bipolar transistor with a light-sensitive collector and base region; the incoming light is absorbed in the narrow bandgap collector and base region, producing electron–hole pairs. The amplification process is the same as that in a transistor, except that the base–emitter forward bias is provided by the optical absorption process rather than a metal contact.[6,7]

Spectral response is a key performance parameter for many photoelectric devices. Even though many reports involving spectral response models have emerged recently for photodiodes,[810] analytical models for HPTs are still rather limited. Chand et al. formulated the expressions for the flux-dependent current,[11] but the boundary conditions were taken from the p–i–n photodetectors, which were not effective for the HPTs, in addition, no experimental data were used to verify the theory they proposed. Several others tried to predict the spectral response of HPTs, but the absorption coefficients in those studies were taken as unity for all the layers in the HPTs, which may not be the case for every detector.[1214] Khan et al. optimized the necessary analytical expressions of the spectral response model using the doping-dependent collection efficency with the incident light radiated at the base region directly.[15] However, according to the theory of Chand,[11] the diffusion current coming from the neutral portion sub-collector should be taken into consideration in calculating the depleted-collector current, which was neglected by Khan owing to the relatively small diffusion coefficients of the minority-carrier holes in the n-type sub-collecter. Furthermore, there are many integrated devices currently employing HPTs with a floating base such as HPTs/OLEDs optical up-converter[16,17] and HPTs/LDs,[18,19] which require the light radiated from the emitter of the HPTs. Moreover, in the optical up-converter, the p–n–p InGaAs/InP HPTs are usually chosen to be integrated with the anode of OLEDs. Thus, the establishment of the spectral response model for the p–n–p HPTs is necessary.

In this paper, we present a back illuminated p–n–p In0.53Ga0.47As/InP HPT along with a corresponding spectral response model. The epitaxial layer structure of this device consists of a p-type InP layer as emitter, a thin n-type In0.53Ga0.47As layer as base, and a p-type In0.53Ga0.47As layer as collector. Unlike the structure of Khan et al.,[15,20,21] the emitter/base junction and the collector/sub-collector junction in our model are neither exposed to the air nor contacted to the metal. So not only the photo-generated minority carriers but also the thermal equilibrium minority carriers electrons (holes) in these regions should be taken into account in the boundary conditions of the spectral response model. The main aim of this study is to determine the spectral response model for the p–n–p HPT which has a perfect agreement with the measurements. Moreover, a nearly proportional relationship between the response and the base width is found in this paper.

2. Device structure

The In0.53Ga0.47As/InP HPT was grown by metal-organic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD) on a semi-insulated InP substrate. The epitaxy structure is as follows: 500 nm InP emitter contact (p+, 1 × 1018 cm−3), 300 nm InP emitter layer (p, 5 × 1017 cm−3), 100 nm InGaAs base layer (n+, 1 × 1018 cm−3), 1 μm InGaAs collector layer (p, 5 × 1017 cm−3). The HPT was capped with a 500 nm InGaAs contact layer (p+, 1 × 1018 cm−3). The first step of the device fabrication was to pattern and etch square mesas (1 mm × 1 mm). The solution of H2SO4:H2O2:H2O (1:8:160) was used to etch the InGaAs layer (∼1.6 μm thick), and the solution of H3PO4:HCl (10:1) was used to etch part of the p-InP layer (∼0.5 μm thick) to complete the square mesas (Fig. 1). Subsequently, metal (Ti/Pt/Au) contacts were deposited on the top and bottom of the device by electron beam evaporation. The spectral response measurements were carried out using a BOMEM spectrometer over 900–1700 nm.

Fig. 1. Schematic cross section of the In0.53Ga0.47As/InP HPT. Note that the top and bottom metal contacts consist of 25 nm Ti, 55 nm Pt, and 120 nm Au.
3. Spectral response modeling

When the p–n–p HPT is exposed to the incoming near-infrared (NIR) light, electron–hole pairs will be generated in the base, depleted-collector, and sub-collector regions. These electrons and holes will be driven to the contrary directions (electrons drifting towards the n-type base region and holes to the p-type sub-collector). The photo-generated electrons will accumulate in the base region due to a large potential barrier in the conduction band at the base–emitter heterojunction until they recombine with the injected holes from the emitter. Thus a large amount of holes inject from the emitter into the base to maintain the charge-neutrality condition in the base layer, leading to a large hole current.

The spectral response model is based on the steady state continuity equations with suitable boundary conditions. The distributions of minority-carriers (electrons and holes) at the low-injection state in the base and sub-collector regions respectively obey

where pn (np) and pn0 (np0) are the total and the equilibrium hole (electron) concentrations in the base (sub-collector), Dp (Dn) and τp (τn) are the diffusion coefficient and the lifetime of the minority-carrier holes (electrons) in the n+-InGaAs base (p+-InGaAs sub-collector) layer, respectively, αb and αc are the optical absorption coefficients of the base and the sub-collector layers, respectively, and φb and φc are the incident flux densities at the emitter/base (x = 0) and the depleted-collector/sub-collector (x = wb + wdep) junctions, respectively. The boundary conditions for the base region are modelled as[21]

where sp is the surface recombination velocity of holes in the n+-InGaAs base. Using Eqs. (2)–(4), the hole distribution in the base region and the hole current at the base/depleted-collector junction Ix = wb are given respectively as

where q is the charge of an electron, A is the area of the photosensitive part of the HPT, and is the minority-hole diffusion length in the base region. The boundary conditions for the sub-collector region are modeled as

The electron current in the sub-collector region Ix=wb+wdep+wc can be similarly derived as

The current in the depleted-collector layer Idr consists of photo-generated current Iph and diffusion current Ix=wb+wdep. The former is owing to the optical-flux absorption, the latter is the result of the electrons diffusion from the neutral portion, which are respectively given as

where φdep is the incident flux density at the base-collector (x = wb) junction, and αdep is the optical absorption coefficient in the depletion region.

4. Results and discussion

The optical-flux profiles of the active regions in the p–n–p In0.53Ga0.47As/InP HPT at 980 nm, 1310 nm, and 1550 nm are given numerically in Fig. 2 with the incident light power of 1 mV, which are modeled by

where n0 = 1, nInP = 3.1, and nInGaAs = 3.9 are the refractive indices of air, InP, and InGaAs, respectively,[22] and φ0 is the flux density of the input light. Due to the absence of anti-reflection coatings, the input optical flux in our model will experience Fresnel reflection at the air/InP and InP/InGaAs interfaces respectively, i.e., the Fresnel reflection loss has been taken into consideration in the above equation.[23] The incident flux density used in Eqs. (6) and (9)–(11) can be obtained from this chart. As clearly seen, the optical flux decays exponentially for all the input light at 980 nm, 1310 nm, and 1550 nm. However, the decay is single-exponential for 980 nm but multi-exponential for 1310 nm and 1550 nm, which is mainly owing to that the absorption coefficient is not doping-dependent for 980 nm, i.e., the absorption coefficient is taken as a constant for all the active regions in this HPT;[24] however, as listed in Table 1, the absorption coefficients for 1310 nm and 1550 nm are layer-dependent, varying from layer to layer with different types and concentrations of doping.

The total current Itotal of this HPT is the sum of the hole current at the base/depeted-collecter junction Ix=wb, the electron current in the sub-collector region Ix=wb+wdep+wc, and the current in the depleted-collector region Idr. The responsivity can be obtained by Itotal/Pin, where Pin is the incident light power. As shown in Fig. 3, the calculated responsivities for this In0.53Ga0.47As/InP HPT at 980 nm, 1310 nm, and 1550 nm are 6.34 A/W, 25.7 A/W, and 28.1 A/W, respectively, which are in good agreement with the measured values.

Fig. 2. The calculated optical-flux profiles for the In0.53Ga0.47As/InP HPT.
Table 1.

Material parameters used for In0.53Ga0.47As/InP HPT simulation.

.
Fig. 3. Calculated and measured responsivities as a function of wavelength for the In0.53Ga0.47As/InP HPT.

We assume that the InP substrate and the emitter region are transparent to NIR light, i.e., light absorption starts from the base layer. For a constant incident light power, the optical flux increases with the increase of the wavelength, resulting in increasing photo-generated electron–hole pairs. While the absorption coefficient is opposite, thus, leading to a responsivity peak at about 1420 nm, and the responsivity tends to drop at longer wavelengths owing to the lower absorption coefficient, which causes a cut-off wavelength around 1700 nm.

For various base widths, the corresponding responsivities are shown in Fig. 4. As observed in this figure, the responsivity has a near linear falling with the increase of the base width. It is common knowledge that an increase in the base width is related to an increasing recombination of the minority-carrier holes and the majority-carrier electrons in the base region, which will lead to a decreasing built-in current gain, i.e., a decreasing responsivity. However, different decreasing rates in responsivity can be found for the under-investigated In0.53Ga0.47As/InP HPT at 980 nm, 1310 nm, and 1550 nm due to the different absorption coefficients and optical-flux profiles in the base region. For the incident light of the wavelength of 1310 nm, the absorption coefficient is lower compared to that of 980 nm, and the optical flux is fewer compared to that of 1550 nm, leading to the fewest photo-generated carriers compared to those at 980 nm and 1550 nm, hence, the falling rate is highest at 1310 nm.

Fig. 4. Calculated responsivities versus the base width for the In0.53Ga0.47As/InP HPT at various incident wavelengths.
5. Conclusion

An accurate spectral response model for the back-illuminated p–n–p In0.53Ga0.47As/InP HPT has been established by applying the semiconductor continuity equations with the exacted boundary conditions which contain the thermal equilibrium minority-carrier electrons (holes). Twice Fresnel reflection and the diffusion current of the electrons from the sub-collector have been taken into consideration in this model. The calculated responsivity is close to the measured one, which has a peak at about 1420 nm. Furthermore, a nearly proportional relationship between the responsivity and the base width has been found in this work.

Reference
1Walker DMonroy EKung PWu JHamilton MSanchez F JDiaz JRazeghi M 1999 Appl. Phys. Lett. 74 762
2Zhou J JJiang R LSha JLiu JShen BZhang RZheng Y D 2003 Chin. Phys. 12 0785
3Li CXue C LLiu ZCheng B WLi C BWang Q M 2014 Chin. Phys. 23 038506
4Zhang YShen S CKim H JChoi SRyou J HDupuis R DNarayan B 2009 Appl. Phys. Lett. 94 221109
5Li X JZhao D GJiang D SLiu Z SChen PWu L LLi LLe L CYang JHe X GWang HZhu J JZhang S MZhang B SYang H 2014 Chin. Phys. 23 028503
6Kamitsuna H 1995 J. Lightw. Technol. 13 2301
7Lunardi Y CChandrasekhar SHamn R A 1993 IEEE Electron Device Lett. 14 19
8Cappelletti M ACedola A PPeltzer E LBlanc Y 2009 Semicond. Sci. Technol. 24 105023
9Cuevas J A R GAbedin T FAli M N EHani E 2006 Opt. Eng. 45 044001
10Arnold M SZimmerman J DRenshaw C KXu XLunt R RAustin C MForrest S R 2009 Nano Lett. 9 3354
11Chand NHouston P ARobson P N 1985 IEEE Trans. Electron Devices ED-32 622
12Salles A A DHackbart A SSpalding L N 1994 Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett. 7 392
13Frimel S MRoenker K P 1997 J. Appl. Phys. 82 3581
14Sridhara RFrimel S MRoenker K PPan NElliott J 1998 J. Lightw. Technol. 16 1101
15Khan H ARezazadeh A ASohaib STauqeer T 2012 IEEE J. Quantum Electron 48 576
16Chen JBan DHelander M GLu ZGraf MPoole PLiu H C 2009 IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 21 1447
17Chen JBan DHelander M GLu Z HPoole P 2010 Adv. Mater. 22 4900
18Tseng H C 2007 IEEE Adv. Packag. Trans. 30 823
19Mashade M B EAshryb MEladl S MRageh M S 2004 Microelectron. 35 585
20Khan H ARezazadeh A ASaleem R 2012 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 51 072202
21Khan H ARezazadeh A A 2009 IEEE Electron Device Lett. 30 1158
22Sze S M1981Physics of Semiconductor Devices2nd Edn.New YorkWiley
23Bashar S A1998Study of Indium Tin Oxide (ITO) for Novel Optoelectronic Devices (Ph.D. Dissertation)LondonKing‘s College London
24Broberg BLindgren S 1984 J. Appl. Phys. 55 3376
25Sheng H2000Modelling, Fabrication and Characterisation of InP-HBTs for Future High-speed Low power Optical Telecommunications(Ph.D. Dissertation)LondonKing’s College London
26Ahrenkiel R KEllingson RJohnston SWanlass M 1998 Appl. Phys. Lett. 72 3470
27Tonai I1991U.S. Patent 5053837[1991-10-1]
28Tyagi M S2008Introduction to Semiconductor Materials and DevicesNew YorkJohn Wiley & Sons
29Humphreys D AKing R JJenkins DMoseley A J 1985 Electron. Lett. 21 1187